Production-grade multi-tenant: schema-per-company PostgreSQL isolation, verified domains, white-label, multi-level admins. B2B agencies.
Multi-Tenant B2B: Junyr vs Alternatives
If you're building a B2B SaaS or managing multiple clients, you need multi-tenant infrastructure. This article compares how Junyr, n8n, Make, and Zapier handle multi-tenancy, and why Junyr is designed for B2B from day one.
TL;DR: Multi-Tenant Comparison
| Feature | Junyr | n8n | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-tenant architecture | ✅ Native (company-based) | ❌ Manual (self-built) | ❌ Per-account (no sharing) | ❌ Per-account (no sharing) |
| Company domains | ✅ @yourcompany.com | ❌ Manual DNS | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Email per company | ✅ Custom domains | ❌ Build yourself | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| User management | ✅ Company admins + users | ❌ Build yourself | ❌ Teams (separate billing) | ✅ Teams (separate billing) |
| Auto-registration | ✅ Domain-based | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Data isolation | ✅ Automatic (PostgreSQL RLS) | ❌ Build yourself | ❌ Manual (separate accounts) | ❌ Manual (separate accounts) |
Verdict: Junyr is the only platform with native multi-tenant B2B architecture.
1. What Is Multi-Tenancy?
Single-Tenant vs Multi-Tenant
Single-Tenant:
- 1 account = 1 user or 1 company
- Each user/company has a separate database or instance
- Example: You manage 10 clients → You need 10 separate accounts
Multi-Tenant:
- 1 platform supports multiple companies (tenants)
- Shared infrastructure with data isolation
- Example: You manage 10 clients → 1 admin account manages all 10 companies
Why Multi-Tenancy Matters for B2B
If you're:
- Agency managing automation for 10+ clients
- Consultant deploying agents for multiple companies
- SaaS provider white-labeling automation
You need multi-tenancy to:
- Centralize management (1 admin account)
- Isolate data (client A can't see client B's data)
- Scale efficiently (add new clients without new infrastructure)
2. Junyr: Native Multi-Tenant Architecture
Company-Based Model
Junyr is designed as a multi-tenant B2B SaaS from day one:
Platform Admin (Super Admin)
├── Company A (Acme Inc)
│ ├── User 1 (john@acme.com) - Company Admin
│ ├── User 2 (jane@acme.com) - User
│ ├── Agent 1 (sales@acme.com) - Max (Sales)
│ ├── Agent 2 (support@acme.com) - Emma (Support)
│ └── Domains: acme.com, acme.fr
├── Company B (TechCorp)
│ ├── User 1 (sarah@techcorp.com) - Company Admin
│ ├── User 2 (bob@techcorp.com) - User
│ ├── Agent 1 (sales@techcorp.com) - Sophie (Sales)
│ └── Domains: techcorp.com
└── Company C (StartupZ)
├── User 1 (founder@startupz.io) - Company Admin
└── Agent 1 (hello@startupz.io) - Alex (General Assistant)
Key Features
1. Company Domains
- Each company can add verified domains (
acme.com,techcorp.com) - Email addresses use company domains (
sales@acme.com, notsales@junyr.app)
2. Auto-Registration
- New users with
@acme.comemail automatically join Acme Inc company - No manual invitation needed (domain verification required)
3. User Roles
| Role | Scope | Permissions |
|---|---|---|
| Super Admin | Platform | Manage all companies, agents, system config |
| Company Admin | Company | Manage company users, agents, domains |
| User | Company | Use company agents, create tasks |
4. Data Isolation
- PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS)
- Each query automatically filtered by
company_id - User A (Company A) cannot see User B's data (Company B)
5. Shared Agents
- All users in Company A can use Agent 1 (Max)
- Agent ownership: Agent created by User 1 → visible to all Company A users
3. n8n: Manual Multi-Tenancy (Self-Built)
The Challenge
n8n is not designed for multi-tenancy. You must build it yourself.
Options:
Option A: Multiple n8n Instances (Separate Databases)
Architecture:
Company A: n8n instance + PostgreSQL DB (separate server)
Company B: n8n instance + PostgreSQL DB (separate server)
Company C: n8n instance + PostgreSQL DB (separate server)
Cost: 3 companies × €50/month (server) = €150/month = €1,800/year
Management: Manual setup, separate backups, separate updates
Option B: Single n8n Instance with Manual Data Isolation
Architecture:
1 n8n instance + 1 PostgreSQL DB
├── Workflow 1 (tagged "company_a")
├── Workflow 2 (tagged "company_b")
└── Workflow 3 (tagged "company_c")
Challenge:
- No native company isolation
- Must manually tag workflows with
company_id - Risk of data leakage (Workflow 1 accesses Company B data by mistake)
- No auto-registration (must invite users manually)
Development time: 3-6 weeks to build multi-tenant logic
4. Make & Zapier: No Multi-Tenancy (Per-Account Model)
The Problem
Make and Zapier use a per-account model:
- Each user or company = separate account
- No data sharing between accounts
- No centralized management
Real Example: Managing 10 Clients
Scenario: You're an agency managing automation for 10 clients.
With Make/Zapier
Option A: 1 account for all clients
Your Account
├── Scenario 1 (Client A: Sales automation)
├── Scenario 2 (Client B: Invoice processing)
├── Scenario 3 (Client C: Lead qualification)
└── ... (10 clients mixed together)
Problems:
- All clients' data mixed in 1 account
- No data isolation (risk of Client A seeing Client B's data)
- Difficult to manage (100+ scenarios)
- Clients can't access their own dashboards
Option B: 10 separate accounts (1 per client)
Account 1 (Client A) - €9/month
Account 2 (Client B) - €9/month
Account 3 (Client C) - €9/month
...
Account 10 (Client J) - €9/month
Cost: 10 accounts × €9/month = €90/month = €1,080/year
Management: Must log into 10 different accounts to manage scenarios
Billing: 10 separate invoices/month (nightmare for accounting)
With Junyr
1 account for all clients:
Your Admin Account
├── Company A
│ ├── User: client_a@company-a.com
│ └── Agents: Max (Sales), Sophie (Accounting)
├── Company B
│ ├── User: client_b@company-b.com
│ └── Agents: Emma (Support)
└── Company C
├── User: client_c@company-c.com
└── Agents: Alex (General Assistant)
Cost: Plan SME (10 companies/agents)
Management: 1 admin dashboard to manage all 10 companies
Billing: 1 invoice/month
Advantage: €1,080 (Make) vs Junyr SME plan = significant savings
5. Multi-Tenant Features Comparison
| Feature | Junyr | n8n | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native multi-tenancy | ✅ Yes (company-based) | ❌ No (build yourself) | ❌ No (per-account) | ❌ No (per-account) |
| Company domains | ✅ @company.com | ❌ Manual DNS | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Auto-registration | ✅ Domain-based | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| User roles | ✅ Super Admin, Company Admin, User | ❌ Build yourself | ✅ Admin, Member | ✅ Admin, Member |
| Data isolation | ✅ PostgreSQL RLS (automatic) | ❌ Manual (code-level) | ❌ Account-level | ❌ Account-level |
| Centralized management | ✅ 1 admin dashboard for all companies | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| White-label | ✅ Custom domains | ❌ Manual | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Billing | ✅ 1 invoice for all companies | ❌ Build yourself | ❌ Separate invoices | ❌ Separate invoices |
6. Real Use Case: Agency Managing 10 Clients
Scenario: Automation Agency
Objective: You manage automation for 10 B2B clients.
With Junyr (Multi-Tenant)
Setup (one-time, 2 hours):
- Create 10 companies in Junyr admin panel
- Add verified domains for each client (
client1.com,client2.com) - Recruit agents for each client (Sales, Support, Accounting)
- Invite client users via email (auto-join via domain)
Cost:
- Junyr SME plan (10 agents)
- Annual: Plan SME x 12 months
Management:
- 1 admin dashboard to manage all 10 clients
- Each client has isolated data (can't see other clients)
- Clients access their own dashboard via
client1.comdomain
Result: Simple, centralized, cost-effective.
With Make (Per-Account)
Setup (one-time, 10-20 hours):
- Create 10 separate Make accounts (1 per client)
- Build workflows for each client separately
- Configure Gmail/HubSpot for each client (10 × 1 hour = 10 hours)
Cost:
- 10 Make accounts × €9/month = €90/month
- 10 Gmail accounts × €5.75 = €57.50/month
- Total: €147.50/month
- Annual: €147.50 × 12 = €1,770/year
Management:
- Must log into 10 separate Make accounts
- 10 separate billing invoices/month
- No centralized dashboard
Result: Complex, expensive, time-consuming.
Difference: €1,770 (Make) vs Junyr SME plan = significant annual savings
7. Domain Verification & Auto-Registration
Junyr's Domain System
How it works:
- Company admin adds domain (
acme.com) - Verify ownership (DNS TXT record or email code)
- Domain approved → Automatic benefits:
- New users with
@acme.comauto-join Acme Inc company - Agents can use
sales@acme.com(instead ofsales@junyr.app) - Full white-label branding
- New users with
Example:
Day 1: Admin creates "Acme Inc" company
Day 2: Admin adds domain "acme.com" → Verifies via DNS
Day 3: New employee joins: john@acme.com → Auto-joins Acme Inc
Day 4: Agent email: sales@acme.com (professional branding)
Result: Zero-friction onboarding for new company users.
Competitors: No Auto-Registration
- Make/Zapier: Must manually invite each user (no domain-based auto-join)
- n8n: Must build domain verification system yourself (3-6 weeks dev)
8. When Do You Need Multi-Tenancy?
✅ You NEED multi-tenancy if:
- You're an agency managing automation for 10+ clients
- You're a consultant deploying agents for multiple companies
- You're building a SaaS that white-labels automation
- You manage multiple companies under 1 organization (holding, group)
❌ You DON'T need multi-tenancy if:
- You're a single company (1 tenant only)
- You're a freelancer managing your own automation
- You have <3 clients (per-account model is acceptable)
Conclusion
Choose Junyr if:
- You're an agency managing 10+ clients
- You need native multi-tenant B2B architecture
- You want centralized management (1 admin dashboard)
- You want custom domains (
sales@clientcompany.com) - You want auto-registration (domain-based onboarding)
Choose n8n/Make/Zapier if:
- You're a single company (1 tenant)
- You're comfortable managing multiple accounts
- You have <3 clients (per-account model acceptable)
- You have a DevOps team to build multi-tenancy (n8n only)
Next: Discover Industry-Specific AI Agents or Agent Memory & Context
Junyr Team
AI Platform Team
The Junyr team builds AI workforce tools that help European SMEs recruit, train, and manage autonomous AI agents for everyday business tasks.
Related Articles
Professional Email Integration: Junyr's Advantage
Integrated Stalwart mail server vs external Gmail integrations. Real-time Email-to-Task, custom domains, S3 archiving.
Read article →3-Step Workflow: Junyr's Quality Guarantee
Query Check, Execution, Verification: the 3-step workflow that significantly reduces errors and guarantees quality.
Read article →Universal Inbox: 360° View vs Scattered Data
JMAP Resources unifies emails, documents, datasets. 3-tier late binding, Project 360 View. End treasure hunt across 5 apps.
Read article →